Editorial Policy

treespuzzle.com publishes original editorial material designed to help readers understand a small puzzle-game series with minimal friction. The core standard is usefulness. Each page should answer a real visitor question such as what the series is about, where to start, how spoiler-heavy a guide is, or what kind of puzzle language a player should expect.

We avoid thin content built only to capture search traffic. If a page does not add meaningful explanation, it should not exist. That is why this site favors deeper overview pages, evergreen guide pages, and clearly labeled analysis over fast but low-value posts that repeat store descriptions without context.

Source handling

When public release dates, platform availability, or feature summaries are mentioned, the site relies on publicly visible information from the relevant store page, official media, or the playable build itself. Interpretive writing, series comparisons, spoiler framing, and player-facing recommendations are editorial judgments produced for this site.

If a fact cannot be verified confidently, it should either be omitted or stated as a qualified observation rather than presented as certainty. This matters because the games are niche, small changes can be easy to miss, and visitors depend on concise pages being accurate.

Corrections and revisions

Pages may be updated for factual corrections, readability improvements, policy changes, or to add more useful explanatory material. Significant changes are made when the current page stops serving the reader well, not merely to refresh the timestamp. Corrections tied to official release details or mistaken attribution are prioritized.

Spoiler-sensitive pages are expected to make that status obvious. Pages that link to external videos or off-site game pages should also provide enough original text that the page remains useful even without the embed.